بسم الله والحمد لله
والصلاة والسلام على رسول الله ، وبعد
Ibn Faaris defines ظلم (Dhulm)
as:
“ظُلْم [Dhulm]
has two root meaning, one of (which is darkness) which is the opposite of light and radiance; and the
other is: putting a thing in other than its own place.”
--end of quote
The Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم
said:
اِتَّقُوا اَلظُّلْمَ, فَإِنَّ اَلظُّلْمَ ظُلُمَاتٌ يَوْمَ اَلْقِيَامَةِ
“Beware of oppression, for
oppression will be excessive darkness on the Day of Judgment.”
[Saheeh al-Bukhaaree (2447) and Saheeh Muslim (6248, 6249) and the wordings are
his]
Lane's Lexicon defines ظلم
(Dhulm) thusly:
“ظَلَمَ [Dhalama] when intransitive usually means:
he did wrong; or acted wrongfully, unjustly, injuriously, or tyrannically: and
when transitive: he wronged; or treated, or used, wrongfully, unjustly,
injuriously, or tyrannically...
الظُلم [adh-Dhulm] signifies the putting a thing in a place not its
own; putting it in a wrong place; misplacing it;... and it is by exceeding or
falling short, or by deviating from the proper time and place: or the acting in
whatsoever way one pleases in the disposal of the property of another: and the
transgressing the proper limit;... or,
According
to some, it primarily signifies النَّقص [an-naqs] (meaning: making to suffer loss
or detriment).”
--end of quote
The types of Dhulm:
With regards to the types of Dhulm, Shaikh Muhammad Ibn
Saaleh al-`Uthaymeen رحمه الله said:
1. The most oppressive (form) of Dhulm, and it is Shirk
with regards to Allaah.
2. The Dhulm done by a person against his own self, so
that he does not give it its rights. For example: he fasts and does not break
the fast; he stays awake and does not sleep (properly).
3. The Dhulm done by a person against someone else. For
example: he transgresses against a person by hitting (him) or killing (him) or
by taking away (his) wealth and whatever resembles that.
[al-Qawl al-Mufeed `alaa Kitaab al-Tawheed]
Question: What if
the Dhulm is no longer found and there is security, but will this be a complete
security?
Answer: If the
Imaan is complete and it is not mixed with disobedience (to Allaah and His
Messenger), then there will be absolute security. But if the Imaan is not
complete, then the security will likewise be inadequate.
Example of this: A person who does a major sin (like
gambling, fornication): He will be secured from permanently being in the
Hellfire, but he will not be secured from the punishment. Rather, he will be
under the Will of Allaah, as Allaah تعالى
said:
﴿إِنَّ اللَّـهَ لَا
يَغْفِرُ أَن يُشْرَكَ بِهِ وَيَغْفِرُ مَا دُونَ ذَٰلِكَ لِمَن يَشَاءُ﴾
{Verily, Allaah forgives
not that partners should be set up with him in worship, but He forgives except
that (anything else) to whom He pleases} [Surah al-Nisaa’ (4): 48,
116]
But as for the one whom Allaah تعالى
blesses to have pure Tawheed then he will have perfect security. He will be
secured from permanently being in the Hellfire, but he will also be secured
from the punishment; this is because of his utmost Imaan.
[al-Qawl al-Mufeed `alaa Kitaab al-Tawheed of Shaikh
Muhammad Ibn Saaleh al-`Uthaymeen]
No comments:
Post a Comment