بسم الله والصلاة والسلام على رسول الله، وبعد
This treatise has been divided into five categories
in order to expound on the subject:
A. The importance of following the texts (the Book of Allaah and
the Ahaadeeth of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم) in the matters of the unseen.
B. Who was the first one to raise the issue that Hoor are males
and females?
C. The actual gender of the Hoor mention in the Qur’aan and the
Ahaadeeth and the sayings of the Salaf (the pious predecessors).
D. The question asked to Shaikh al-`Uthaymeen رحمه الله.
E.
The question of Umm Salamah رضي الله عنها
to the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم.
A. The importance of following
the texts in the matters of the unseen:
Verily, the affair of interpreting the
Qur’aan and the Sunnah according to one’s opinion is a very serious thing and
it should not be taken lightly. We have been warned by the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم
to beware from such practices.
There is a narration that the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم is
supposed to have said: “If anyone interprets the
Book of Allaah in the light of his opinion even if he is right, he has erred.”
[Sunan Abu Dawood (3652) and Tirmidhee (2952) and it has been graded as
“Dha`eef” by Shaikh al-Albaanee]
After mentioning the above Hadeeth Imaam
Tirmidhee رحمه الله said: “This is how it was reported on the authority of some of
the scholars from amongst the Companions of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم
and other than them that they were very strict about this (issue) of interpreting
the Qur’aan without knowledge.”
Even though this Hadeeth is “Dha`eef”, its meaning is correct; because if left
unchecked, it will give the opportunity to the people to interpret the Qur’aan
according to their own opinion. Even if we were to discard this Hadeeth because
of its weakness, we still have other narrations which still prohibit speaking
about religion with one’s own opinion and understanding.
Narrated `Aaishah رضي الله عنها: Allaah's Apostle صلى الله
عليه وسلم recited the Verse: {It is He
who has sent down to you the Book. In it are Verses that are entirely clear,
they are the foundation of the Book, others not entirely clear. So as for those
in whose hearts there is a deviation (from the Truth), follow thereof that is
not entirely clear seeking affliction and searching for its hidden meanings;
but no one knows its hidden meanings but Allaah. And those who are firmly
grounded in knowledge say: "We believe in it (i.e. in the Qur'an) the
whole of it (i.e. its clear and unclear Verses) are from our Lord. And none
receive admonition except men of understanding.} [Surah aal-`Imraan (3):7]
Then Allaah's Apostle صلى الله عليه وسلم
said, “If you see those who
follow thereof that is not entirely clear, then they are those whom Allaah has
named [as having deviation (from the Truth). So beware of them.” [Saheeh
al-Bukhaaree (4547) and Saheeh Muslim (4823)]
Masruq reported that there came to `Abdullaah
(Ibn Mas`ood) رضي الله عنه a person
and said: I have left behind in the Masjid a man who explains the Qur’aan
according to his own opinion and he explained this verse: {So wait for the day when the Heaven brings a clear
smoke.} He says that a smoke would come to the people on the Day of
Resurrection and it will withhold their breath and they would be inflicted with
cold. `Abdullaah said: “He who has knowledge should say something and he who
has no knowledge should simply say: ‘Allaah knows best.’ This reflects the
understanding of a person that he should say about that which he does not know
that it is Allaah who knows best.” [Saheeh Muslim (5012)]
Narrated `Alee ibn AbuTaalib رضي الله عنه: “If the religion were based on opinion, it would be more
important to wipe the under part of the shoe than the upper, but I have seen
the Messenger of Allaah صلى الله
عليه وسلم wiping over the upper part of his shoes.” [Sunan Abu Dawood (162, 164) and graded as “Saheeh” by Shaikh
al-Albaanee]
Abu Bakr al-Siddeeq رضي الله عنه said: “Which land
will carry me and which heaven will shade me if I said about Allaah’s Book that
which I have no knowledge of?” [Tafseer Tabaree]
So, this acts as a clear warning to stick
to the text especially in the matters of unseen. It is not befitting a Muslim to
interpret the Qur’aan with his own opinion.
B. Who was the first one to
raise the issue that Hoor are males and females?
The first person to raise the issue to
the English language people, that the Hoor are also divided into males and
females, is Muhammad `Ali in his translation of the Qur’aan. He said in his
commentary to Surah al-Toor (52):20
“As regards the word húr, it is a plural
of ahwar (applied to a man) and of haurá’ (applied to a woman), signifying one
having eyes characterized by the quality termed hawar, which means intense
whiteness of the white of the eye and intense blackness of the black thereof.
The word ahwar (singular of húr) also signifies pure or clear intellect (Lane’s
Lexicon). The other word, ‘ín, is plural of a‘yan (meaning a man wide in the
eyes) and of ‘ainá’ (meaning a woman beautiful and wide in the eye). The latter
word also signifies a good or beautiful word, or saying (Lane’s Lexicon). It
may be noted that whiteness is also a symbol of perfect and unsullied purity,
and hence the two words húr and ‘ín really stand for purity and beauty; and
therefore, instead of white-eyed and large-eyed ones, I adopt the words pure
and beautiful ones, as being more expressive of the true significance.”
Muhammad
Asad, who also did a translation of the Qur’aan, relied mostly on the
translation and commentary of Muhammad `Ali and said nearly the same thing as
above.
There are a few problems with the authors
and their translations:
The first problem: the Aqeedah.
Muhammad `Ali was Ahmadiyyah in his
belief and belonged to “Lahore Ahmadiyaah Movement”; and he was the follower of
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiyaan.
From the belief of “Lahore Ahmadiyaah
Movement” is that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was the Messiah, and the awaiting Mahdi –
two in one (other hardcore Qaadiyanees believe that Ghulam Ahmad was in fact a
prophet).
The praise of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad by
Muhammad `Ali can be found in the introduction to his translation of the
Qur’aan:
“And lastly, the greatest religious
leader of the present time, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian, has inspired me with
all that is best in this work. I have drunk deep at the fountain of knowledge which
this great Reformer — Mujaddid of the present century and founder of the Ahmadiyyah
Movement — has made to flow.”
From their false doctrine is that `Isaa عليه السلام died a natural death. Muhammad
`Ali translated the ayah of [Surah al-Nisaa’ (4): 158] as:
“Nay,
Allah exalted him in His presence. And Allah is ever Mighty, Wise.”
The
word “exalt” means: praise, honor, raise in rank. It never means that Allaah
physically raised `Isaa عليه
السلا.
Muhammad
Asad, in following the footsteps of his mentor (Muhammad `Ali) commented on the
above ayah as:
“where
God says to Jesus, “Verilly I shall cause thee to die, and shall exalt thee
unto me.” The verb Rafa`ahu (lit. “He raised him” or “elevated him”) has
always, whenever the act of raf` (“elevating”) a human being is attributed to
God, the meaning of “honoring” or “exalting”. Nowhere in the Qur’an is there
any warrant for the popular belief that God has “taken up” Jesus bodily, in his
lifetime, into heaven.”
The
correct translation is as has been translated by Muhammad Mohsin Khan and Taqeeuddin
al-Hilali:
{But Allâh raised him [`Isâ
(Jesus)] up (with his body and soul) to Himself (and he ['alayhis-salâm] is in
the heavens). And Allâh is Ever All-Powerful, All-Wise.}
The
reality that `Isaa عليه السلام has not died but has
been raised up alive by Allaah is clearly mentioned in the following Ahaadeeth:
Narrated
Abu Hurayrah: The Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم
said: “There is no prophet between me and him,
that is, Jesus (`Isaa عليه السلام). He will descend (to the earth). When you see him, recognise
him: a man of medium height, reddish fair, wearing two light yellow garments,
looking as if drops were falling down from his head though it will not be wet.
He will fight the people for the cause of Islam. He will break the cross, kill
swine, and abolish jizyah. Allah will perish all religions except Islam. He (`Isaa
عليه السلام) will destroy the Antichrist and will live on the earth for
forty years and then he will die. The Muslims will pray over him.” [Sunan Abu
Dawood (4324) and authenticated by Shaikh al-Albaanee and he said: “It is as
per the condition of Imaam Muslim”]
Narrated Abu Hurairah: Allah's Apostle صلى الله عليه وسلم
said, “By Him in Whose Hands my
soul is, son of Mary (Jesus) will shortly descend amongst you people (Muslims)
as a just ruler and will break the cross and kill the pig and abolish the Jizya
(a tax taken from the non-Muslims who are in the protection of the Muslim
government). Then there will be abundance of money and nobody will accept
charitable gifts.” [Saheeh al-Bukhaaree]
And there are many more Ahaadeeth, but
these two will suffice, inshaa-Allaah.
The second problem: not
accepting the Hadeeth
The proper way of explaining the Qur’aan
is as what Imaam Ibn Katheer رحمه الله
said in the introduction of his Tafseer:
“So
one seeks the Tafseer of the Qur’aan with the Qur’aan itself and with the
Sunnah. If one cannot find the Tafseer in the Qur’aan or the Sunnah, he should
refer to the statement of the Companions, who were the most knowledgeable of
Tafseer…”
And
he also said:
“When
unable to find the Tafseer in the Qur’aan, the Sunnah or with the Companions,
the scholars then look to the Tafseer of the Taabi`een (the second generation
of Muslims)…”
But
you do not find this in the commentaries of both
Muhammad `Ali and Muhammad Asad. This is the
reason why both of them deviated from the truth, because they only relied on
their own opinion, irrespective of what was mentioned in the Sunnah. One such example
has already been stated above; the second is on the subject of Hoor.
Even though acknowledging the fact that the
word “Hoor” has been mentioned in the Qur’aan and the Ahaadeeth in feminine
form, they went on to explain it on the basis of the `Arabic language. And thus
they spoke with their own understanding and opinion and they spoke about the
unseen without clear knowledge.
The fact that both of these two were
deviants in their `Aqeedah (Creed), which is openly seen in their translation
and commentary; it is only befitting that we should not refer to these two
translations or their commentaries at all.
Note: These are not the only two mistakes in their translations and
commentaries; rather they even deny the Names and Attributes of Allaah, (like
the Face, Hand, His rising over the throne etc.) and say that it is all
metaphorical.
C. The actual gender of the
Hoor mention in the Qur’aan and the Ahaadeeth and the sayings of the Salaf.
The description of the Hoor has been
mentioned in the Qur’aan and the Sunnah many times. If one reads and
understands `Arabic, they will find that in all these places the Hoor has been
mentioned in feminine form.
Allaah knows best that if this is done
out of ignorance or because of feminism. But surely those who try to explain
that the Hoor can also be a male have no daleel (evidence) to support their
claim. There is not a single incident where Hoor have been addressed in masculine
form in the Qur’aan or the Sunnah.
The following are a few examples from the
Aayaat, the Ahaadeeth and the saying of the Companions and their followers:
1. Surah Al-Dukhan (44):54
﴿كَذَلِكَ
وَزَوَّجْنَـهُم بِحُورٍ عِينٍ ﴾
{So (it will be), and We
shall marry them to Houris (female fair ones) with wide, lovely eyes.}
Imaam Ibn Katheer said in explanation of the above ayah:
{So (it will be). And We
shall marry them to Hoor (fair females) with wide lovely eyes,} This will be a gift in addition to the beautiful wives
given to them.
2. Surah Ar-Rahmaan (55):56-58
﴿فِيهِنَّ
قَـصِرَتُ الطَّرْفِ لَمْ يَطْمِثْهُنَّ إِنسٌ قَبْلَهُمْ وَلاَ جَآنٌّ فَبِأَىِّ
ءَالاءِ رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ كَأَنَّهُنَّ الْيَاقُوتُ وَالْمَرْجَانُ﴾
{Wherein both will be Qaasiraat
At-Tarf, whom never deflowered a human before nor Jinn. Then which of the
blessings of your Lord will you both deny. They are like Yaaqoot and Marjaan.}
Imaam Ibn Katheer said in explanation of the above ayaat:
﴿
قَـصِرَتُ الطَّرْفِ ﴾
{Qaasiraat At-Tarf} chaste females, wives restraining their glances,
desiring none except their husbands, seeing them as the most beautiful men in
Paradise. This was said by Ibn `Abbaas, Qataadah, `Ata' Al-Khurasani and Ibn
Zayd.
It was reported that one of these wives will say to her
husband, “By Allaah! I neither see anything in Paradise more handsome than you
nor more beloved to me than you. So praise be to Allaah Who made you for me and
made me for you.”
Allaah تعالى said:
﴿
لَمْ يَطْمِثْهُنَّ إِنسٌ قَبْلَهُمْ وَلاَ جَآنٌّ ﴾
{whom never deflowered a
human before nor Jinn} meaning
they are delightful virgins of comparable age who never had sexual intercourse
with anyone, whether from mankind or Jinns, before their husbands. This is also
a proof that the believers among the Jinns will enter Paradise. Artat bin
Al-Mundhir said, “Damrah bin Habeeb was asked if the Jinns will enter Paradise
and he said, ‘Yes, and they will get married. The Jinns will have Jinn women
and the humans will have female humans.’”
Allaah's تعالى statement:
﴿
لَمْ يَطْمِثْهُنَّ إِنسٌ قَبْلَهُمْ وَلاَ جَآنٌّ فَبِأَىِّ ءَالاءِ رَبِّكُمَا
تُكَذِّبَانِ ﴾
{whom never deflowered a
human before nor Jinn. Then which of the blessings of your Lord will you both
deny} Then Allaah describes these
women for the proposed:
﴿
كَأَنَّهُنَّ الْيَاقُوتُ وَالْمَرْجَانُ ﴾
{they are like Yaaqoot and
Marjaan} Mujaahid, Al-Hasan, Ibn
Zayd and others said, “They are as pure as rubies and white as Marjaan.” So
here they described Marjaan as pearls.
3. Surah Ar-Rahmaan (55):72-74
﴿ حُورٌ
مَّقْصُورَتٌ فِى الْخِيَامِ فَبِأَىِّ ءَالاءِ رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ لَمْ
يَطْمِثْهُنَّ إِنسٌ قَبْلَهُمْ وَلاَ جَآنٌّ﴾
{Hoor (beautiful, fair
females) guarded in pavilions; Then which of the blessings of your Lord will
you both deny, Whom never deflowered a human before nor Jinn.}
Imaam Ibn Katheer said in explanation of the above ayaat:
{Hoor (beautiful, fair
females) guarded in pavilions} but
He said about the first two gardens,
﴿فِيهِنَّ
قَـصِرَتُ الطَّرْفِ﴾
{Wherein both will be Qaasiraat
At-Tarf} There is no doubt that
the chaste wives (of this world) that restrain their glances themselves, are
better than those guarded in pavilions even though both are secluded.
About Allaah’s تعالى saying:
﴿فِى
الْخِيَامِ﴾
{in pavilions} Al-Bukhaaree (4880) recorded that `Abdullaah bin
Qays said that the Messenger of Allaah صلى الله عليه وسلم said: “Verily, in
Paradise, the believer will have a tent from a hollow pearl, the width thereof
is sixty miles. In each corner of it there are wives for the believer that do
not see the other wives, and the believer will visit them all.” [Saheeh
al-Bukhaaree (4880)]
In another narration the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم said that this tent is thirty miles wide. [Saheeh
al-Bukhaaree (3243)]
Muslim recorded this Hadeeth and in his narration, the
Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم said: “Verily
in Paradise, the believer will have a tent made of a hollow pearl the length
thereof being sixty miles. In it, the believer will have wives who do not see
each other, and the believer will visit them all.” [Saheeh Muslim
(5074)]
Allaah تعالى said:
﴿لَمْ
يَطْمِثْهُنَّ إِنسٌ قَبْلَهُمْ وَلاَ جَآنٌّ ﴾
{Whom never were
deflowered by a human before nor Jinn.} We
explained this meaning before. Allaah added in the description of the first
group of the believers' wives,
﴿كَأَنَّهُنَّ
الْيَاقُوتُ وَالْمَرْجَانُ فَبِأَىِّ ءَالاءِ رَبِّكُمَا تُكَذِّبَانِ ﴾
{they are like Yaaqoot
(rubies) and Marjaan (pearls}
4. Hadeeth:
Already two Ahaadeeth have been mentioned above, and this
is the third.
Narrated
Abu Hurairah رضي الله عنه: The Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم said, “The first batch
(of people) who will enter Paradise will be (glittering) like the moon on a
full-moon night, and the batch next to them will be (glittering) like the most
brilliant star in the sky. Their hearts will be as if the heart of a single
man, for they will have neither enmity nor jealousy amongst themselves;
everyone will have two wives from the Hoor, (who will be so beautiful, pure and
transparent that) the marrow of the bones of their legs will be seen through
the bones and the flesh.” [Saheeh Al-Bukhaaree (3245, 3246, 3254) and Saheeh Muslim
(5066, 5069)].
D. The question asked to Shaikh
al-`Uthaymeen رحمه الله.
Q.58. It has been mentioned that men
will have Al-Hoor Al-`Ain in Paradise. What will there be for women?
Response of Shaikh Ibn 'Uthaimeen رحمه الله:
Allaah,
the Most Blessed, the Most High says, regarding the blessings of Paradise:
{
..Therein you shall have (all) that your inner-selves desire, and therein you
shall have (all) for which you ask for. An entertainment from (Allâh), the
Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.} [Surah Fussilat (41):31-32]
And
He, the Most High says:
{..And
therein all that inner-selves could desire, and all that eyes could delight in
and you will abide therein forever.} [Surah Az-Zukhruf (43):71]
And
it is well known that marriage is one of the things which the souls desire
most, and so it will be found in Paradise for the people of Paradise, whether
they be men or women. So, Allaah, the Most Blessed, the Most High will marry
the woman in Paradise to the man who was her husband in the life of this world,
as He, the Most Blessed, the Most High says:
{Our
Lord! And make them enter the 'Adn (Eden) Paradise (everlasting Gardens) which
you have promised them - and to the righteous among their fathers, their wives,
and their offspring! Verily, You are the All Mighty, the All-Wise.} [Surah Ghafir (40):8]
If
she did not marry in the life of this world, then Allaah, the Most High will
marry her to one who pleases her in Paradise.
Taken
from
Fatawa Arkan-ul-Islam, (Islamic
Verdicts on the Pillars of Islam, Pages 178 - 179)
By the Honorable Shaikh
Muhammad bin Salih Al-'Uthaimeen رحمه الله
E. The question of Umm Salamah رضي الله عنها to the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم.
Allaah
نعالى says:
{Verily, the Muslims
(those who submit to Allaah in Islaam) men and women, the believers men and
women (who believe in Islaamic Monotheism), the men and the women who are
obedient (to Allaah), the men and women who are truthful (in their speech and
deeds), the men and the women who are patient (in performing all the duties
which Allaah has ordered and in abstaining from all that Allaah has forbidden),
the men and the women who are humble (before their Lord – Allaah), the men and
the women who give Sadaqaat (i.e. Zakaat and alms), the men and the women who
observe Saum (fast) (the obligatory fasting during the month of Ramadaan, and
the optional Nawaafil fasting), the men and the women who guard their chastity
(from illegal sexual acts) and the men and the women who remember Allaah much
with their hearts and tongues – Allaah has prepared for them forgiveness and a
great reward (i.e. Paradise).} [Surah al-Ahzaab (33):35]
Imaam Ibn Katheer reported the
following Hadeeth in the explanation of the above ayah:
Imaam Ahmad
recorded that Umm Salamah رضي الله عنها, the wife of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم, said, “I said to the
Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم: `Why is it, that we
are not mentioned in the Qur’aan as (often as the) men are?’ Then one day without my realizing
it, he صلى الله عليه وسلم was calling from the Minbar and I was combing
my hair, so I tied my hair back then I went out to my chamber in my house, and
I started listening out, and he was saying from the Minbar:
«يَاأَيُّهَا
النَّاسُ إِنَّ اللهَ تَعَالَى يَقُولُ:
“O People! Verily Allaah says:
﴿إِنَّ الْمُسْلِمِينَ وَالْمُسْلِمَاتِ وَالْمُؤْمِنِينَ وَالْمُؤْمِنَاتِ﴾»
{Verily,
the Muslims: men and women, the believers: men and women...}”
to the end of the
Ayah.” [Musnad Imaam Ahmad (26575, 26603, 26604) and graded as “Saheeh” by
Shaikh Shu`aib al-Arnaoot. A similar narration is also reported by Tirmidhee (3211) and graded as "Saheeh" by Shaikh al-Albaanee]
It is sufficient
for our Muslim sisters to suffice with what sufficed the Sahaabiyaat (the
female Companions) رضوان الله عليهن اجمعين, and trust in Allaah
that He is going to give them {a great
reward}, which no eyes have
seen, no ears have heard, and never perceived by any human heart.
As salaam alyk,
ReplyDeleteMuhammed Ali and Yusuf Ali are two different people? So even Yusuf Ali interpreted hoor as genderless? http://salaf-us-saalih.com/2010/07/24/beware-of-abdullaah-yusuf-ali-translation/
Muhammad Asad is not even reliable, for he has major errors. In his commentary of the Quran, he interprets gives allegorical interpretations to stories. He rejects that Isa was raised bodily to Allah. His translation claims that Jesus died. Also, he misinterprets Surah 2:54 and other verses.
DeleteThe senior scholars comment on his translation:
http://www.alifta.com/Fatawa/FatawaChapters.aspx?languagename=en&View=Page&PageID=906&PageNo=1&BookID=7
Jazaak Allaahu kahira for the link.
Deletewa `alaikum assalaam,
ReplyDeleteyes, Muhammad `Ali and Yusuf `Ali are two different people, and both have deviancies in their translations and commentaries.
And this is the reason why the Saudi govt. after realizing the major faults in the translation by Yusuf `Ali, stopped its publication and distribution, and opted for the translation by Muhammad Mohsin Khan and Taqee-uddin al-Hilaalee (Allaah have Mercy on them).
barak Allaahu feek.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteWa `alaikum assalaam akhi,
DeleteKindly re-read the topic. It was already clarified, who first spoke with this meaning, and who Muhammad Asad is and what his `aqeedah is.
As for playing with the words Hoor, Ahwar, Hawar...this is all linguistic interpretation. Here we are talking about unseen matters (`ilm al-ghaib), and we simply cannot rely on linguistic interpretations on the subject of unseen matters. We need to have evidence. Linguistic interpretation in the matters of unseen is no proof.
And the word Hoor in the Qur'aan and the Sunnah has always come in feminine gender. So those who say that Hoor can be male, should bring evidence to support their claim.
Allaah is not unjust to his slaves either male or female. He will reward the females immensely in the Jannah - and this has been mentioned in the Qur'aan many times.
And if you still want to rely on Muhammad Asad's translation, then plz re-read the post, he believes that Isaa عليه السلام is dead and that he was not raised up alive into the Jannah.
Allaahul musta`aan.
Moreover, read the Tafaaseer of classical scholars like Ibn Katheer, Ibn Jareer al-Tbaaree, al-Qurtobee, al-Baghawee, Ibn Abi Haatim. These were all `Arabs or knew `Arabic very well. Why don't you find the same linguistic interpretation in their books?
DeleteJazakAllahu Khairan ya akhi :)
Delete